When technology kills the look 👀 ...

Photography has never been so accessible, so powerful or so technically advanced. Surgical autofocus, ultra-defined sensors, software capable of correcting, optimising and enhancing almost anything. And yet... never have the eyes seemed so fragile, don't you think?

A paradox emerges: as technology advances, something is lost. A presence. An intention. A breath. What if, by trying so hard, we end up not really seeing? 🧐

1. Confusion between technical expertise and vision

Has technology become an end in itself?Worse: a criterion of legitimacy?

  • Perfect sharpness
  • Impeccable exposure
  • Well-set histogram
  • Clean, controlled, reassuring colours

Everything is right... but can it be empty? Photography then becomes an exercise in conformity:

«Instead of »Does it say anything?«

The eye can vanish behind the process.

2. Photographing with your head rather than your eyes

Are we, photographers, really still looking?

Aren't we anticipating too much?

  • “I'll correct it in post-processing”.”
  • “AI will recover the shadows”.”
  • “I'll reframe later”
  • “I'll do a punchier version”

The scene is no longer experienced, it is mentally optimised before it is even felt. On the one hand, it's good to be able to plan ahead, to anticipate, but Wouldn't mastery mean doing as much as possible when you capture it, depending on how you feel? Take the time to feel? To capture? 😌

The risk:

We no longer photograph what is there, but what we plan to make afterwards.

3. The obsession with control: mastering everything, smoothing everything out

Modern technology loves control. And control hates the unexpected.

  • Perfect skies
  • Colours too clean
  • Over-balanced atmospheres
  • Instagrammable but interchangeable images

But what makes a strong image is not perfection.

It's often :

  • Wobbly lighting
  • A disturbing dark area
  • A colour that stands up
  • A deliberate imbalance

Technique seeks to correct. The eye, on the other hand, accepts and bears witness to a reality.

4. The gaze is born of silence, not performance

The look cannot be decreed, it evolves and matures. You can't buy it with a more expensive camera or an extra plug-in.

It appears when :

  • Slowing down
  • We doubt
  • We observe without wanting to produce
  • We agree to do not trigger

Many great images are created before the camera. In a moment of suspension. Technique speaks loudly.

The technique or the look
The technique or the look ?

The eyes speak softly.

5. Putting technology back where it belongs

Please note, I'm not saying that technology is the enemy, but I think it should be a servant, not an artistic director. 😅. It should :

  • Disappearing while shooting
  • Act afterwards, with humility
  • Reinforce an existing intention

When technology becomes invisible, the gaze can finally appear.

6. Photograph less, see more

Maybe the solution is simple, and difficult at the same time 😜 :

  • Trigger less
  • Less correct
  • Less evidence
  • Feel more
  • No more leaving things to chance

A strong photograph does not say:

«Look how well it's done»

He says:

«Just look...»

7. Conclusion

Technology doesn't kill the look with excessive power. She kills him when the decision is relinquished to her. the look must be a choice, an internal positioning, and even more a form of presence in the world.

But paradoxically, The more advanced the technique, the rarer and more precious the eyes can become.

Perhaps, in a world of perfect images, true radicalism consists simply in seeing.

There, that was my little philosophy for the day 🤓 ! Thanks for visiting and reading, feel free to read more in my philosophy of photography category, travel a little in my galleries.

Well photographed,

David

Thank you for sharing...

Subscribe to the newsletter ...

Maximum 1 mail / month to stay in the adventure

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Consent Management Platform by Real Cookie Banner